[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 12-6



Conditions were not particularly good here either, Gary, with the same two stations topping out the pack. But 747 was a bit of a star around 1520UT, easily 10dB better than either 740 or 750 domestic channels, and not just a brief peak either. 774 and 828 didn't come close, though they were audible. Actually dug out some audio on 972 as well. I'll go over the files later, but I suspect it will otherwise be extreme minimalist DX.

Intriguing, given that your Asiatic conditions are usually better than Victoria's. (and, Chris Kadlec might chime in on 1053, or the lack thereof. I believe that they "sign off" just after 1400UT, which would explain their lack of signal after 1500UT, hi. )

best wishes,

Nick


At 15:59 06-12-16, d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
After a comatose predawn band check a couple of diehard Asians actually managed some ghostly audio this morning at peak dawn enhancement. The meager TP propagation was all on the low band as 594-JOAK hit some poor to fair peaks around 1500, and 747-JOIB did the same around 1505. 693, 774 and 828 only showed up with anemic carriers, while the usual Koreans on 972, 1053 and 1566 couldn't even manage that. Such was the story of a pretty dreary morning.

73 and Good DX,
Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
7.5" loopstick C.Crane Skywave Ultralight +
15" FSL antenna


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Nick Hall-Patch
Victoria, BC
Canada
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx