Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 12-4

[Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>]

Gary, anything that renews the excitement of dxing works for me.
Experiencing little or no noise is simply exhilarating no matter what
equipment is used!  Walt

On Monday, December 5, 2016, <d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Walt,
>
> <<< I listened in the 14:15 to 15:30 time frame from Point No Point, near
> Victoria, BC using my DeBock modified Tecsun PL-380 ULR. I could hear 774
> and 594 at fair level, but that was about it. What was remarkable, though,
> was how electrically quiet things are in rural locations! What a treat to
> MW DX and hear station after station, simply by rotating the ferrite
> antenna and not hearing any noise. Just like in the good old days! >>>
>
> Yes, the "good old days" have never ended, for some of us. We may not
> track down as much total DX as the SDR users, but we certainly track down
> some serious fun!
>
> Our two Japanese DXpedition partners at Rockwork 4 last July (Hiroo
> Nakagawa and Satoshi Miyauchi) are both famous Japanese SDR-DXers, but they
> both remarked about how the modified Ultralight radios have brought renewed
> excitement in their DXing hobby. They were both carrying their modified
> PL-380's around like side arms, during their two ocean cliff DXing sessions.
>
> 73, Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Walter Salmaniw" <canswl@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>>
> To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" <
> irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>>
> Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2016 1:31:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 12-4
>
> I listened in the 14:15 to 15:30 time frame from Point No Point, near
> Victoria, BC using my DeBock modified Tecsun PL-380 ULR. I could hear 774
> and 594 at fair level, but that was about it. What was remarkable, though,
> was how electrically quiet things are in rural locations! What a treat to
> MW DX and hear station after station, simply by rotating the ferrite
> antenna and not hearing any noise. Just like in the good old days! I was
> also amazed on how little Vancouver interfered with listening, and even our
> local CFAX 1070 was for a bit, not audible at all. Interesting, indeed!
> Reception on this site on the north side of the Straits of Juan de Fuca,
> not far from the entrace, was very similar to reception on the WA and OR
> coasts vis a vis domestic DX at least. 73,...Walt Salmaniw, Victoria, BC
>
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 9:06 PM, <d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > The Japanese and Korean big guns were once again well represented during
> > the dawn session but the second-tier Asians continued to drop off in
> > strength and variety. The regulars on 594, 693, 747, 774, 828, 972, 1053
> > and 1566 were in and out of good audio as usual from 1430-1515 but the
> > Chinese were missing in action, while 603, 657 and 738 could only manage
> > ghostly audio on peaks. The Chinese propagation that was pretty good a
> > couple days ago has now fizzled out completely with the exception of a
> > strong carrier on 1593 (that couldn't quite manage audio through Seattle
> > splatter). Of course for most of November conditions were much worse, so
> > maybe we should be thankful for the NHK big guns?
> >
> > 73 and Good DX,
> > Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
> > 7.5" loopstick C.Crane Skywave Ultralight+
> > 15" FSL antenna
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx