Re: [IRCA] WGN Chicago 720,WBBM 780 in BC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] WGN Chicago 720,WBBM 780 in BC



OK... from 35 miles NW of Chicago last night had the best low band BCB cx 
I've EVER had here. Logging KVNA and KOGO on 600 thru WMT ain't so bad. 
Tonite is still good low band but nothing extraordinary...ie in midband Team 
1040 is only very occ. heard as chatter thru WHO and there's only traces on 
News 1130's ancrs. Sometimes those two are easy and 1130 is almost totally 
dominant on my westerly Phased BOG System.

73 KAZ 12 miles NNW of WGN and 13 miles NNW of WBBM
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nick Hall-Patch" <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" 
<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] WGN Chicago 720


> At 03:22 08/10/2005, you wrote:
>>Normally I limit myself to Trans-Pacific MW dxing from Victoria, but right
>>now, I'm listening to 720 WGN in Chicago with a nice ID at 03:15.  I don't
>>remember hearing anything but K stations, so this is a bit of a catch for
>>me!.....Walt Salmaniw, Victoria, BC.
>
> You might try 780 where WBBM is dominant (!) right now using the ALA 100,
> the sloper and the Flag pointing in the opposite direction.  670 is a 
> mess,
> don't know who is dominant, but Chicago should be there too.  If you get
> WLS on 890, that will easily match your reception of Vietnam on 675...
>
> Also, brief carrier on 1314 at 0422UT, but gone again...
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
> ****************************************************************************
> Nick Hall-Patch
> Victoria, B.C.
> Canada
>
> ****************************************************************************
>

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx