[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] AM vs MW-IBOC range differences
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] AM vs MW-IBOC range differences
- From: "David Gleason" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:11:14 -0700
- Organization: David Gleason
- Thread-index: AcW8z7Tyozo7xw8jQbGTg8ymDJEX9wAAFn0g
And the HD algorithm and technical gear are vastly different and improved
from that time. AM sounded truly horrible then, with lots of artifacts and
ringing. It sounds pretty great now.
-----Original Message-----
From: irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Patrick Martin
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 9:07 PM
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club ofAmerica
Subject: Re: [IRCA] AM vs MW-IBOC range differences
Thanks Scott. I notice that, for sure! I think back during the NAB
convention in Seattle about 2002 when KIXI was testing IBOC, that test
was a bit worse. They probably were using more IBOC power in their test.
KEX is stronger than KIXI is here.
73,
Patrick
Patrick Martin
Seaside OR
KAVT Reception Manager
_
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx