----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 5:03
PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] E10 VS S350
In my recent personal experience the S350
is much more sensitive on the MF AM broadcast band then E10 using the built in
loopstick antennas. But the E10 is much more sensitive on SW than the S350
using the built in whip antennas.
The S350 is a little more sensitive on FM
versus the E10 using the built in whip
antennas.
The E10 wins hand down on frequency stability but the S350 wins on audio
quality. Also the E10 has a built in antenna trimmer circuit on SW that allows
you to peak the signal via the whip and also the included 23 foot wire
antenna.
I bought the E10 for portable shortwave
listening only because I feel that the S350 is very poor on SW as far as
stability, images and front end overload. The E10 is also much better on SW
than my Sangean ATS-909 using the built in whip
antennas.
Besides the reel in/out antenna and
leather case the E10 also comes with a nice pair of ear buds and rechargeable
NiCad batteries that are recharged inside the radio when it's
off.
73 & GUD DX,
Thomas F. Giella,
KN4LF
Retired Meteorologist & Space Plasma Physicist
Lakeland, FL,
USA
Grid Square EL97AW
27 57 26.5 N 81 56 46.6 W
kn4lf@xxxxxxxx
Eton E10
Grundig S350
Sangean
ATS-909
Sangean ATS-818
Yaesu FT-1000MP Mark V
2 Foot Box Loop
5
Foot Coaxial Loop
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 4:15
PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] [ABDX] Nice cx on
the low end of HF here in FL
How does the E10 compare to the S350?
The S350 could be
better on SW, but it is better than not having it.
Patrick
Martin
Seaside OR
KAVT Reception Manager
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG
Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.1/104 - Release Date:
9/16/2005
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing
list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions
expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information:
http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message:
irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx