[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] IBOC DXing
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] IBOC DXing
- From: "Bill Harms" <wharms@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 18:08:09 -0400
- Content-description: Mail message body
- Priority: normal
David:
That could be true for an individual station that itself is not
suffering from sidebend IBOC interference. The real test would be
how would stations fair in an environment crowded with IBOC signals.
Mr'. Ray's testing notwithstanding, there has not been enough testing
to determine the extent of this problem.
Bill Harms
On 18 Sep 2005 at 14:20, David Gleason wrote:
> Some of us have measured the useful coverage of the digital AM signal
> vs. the HD signal. In markets with high noise, like LA and NY, the HD
> signal is usable at greater distances than the analog signal. Similar
> testing by Tom Ray at WOR have born out the finding that stations can
> increase their interference free coverage with HD.
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx