[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] cc crane radio
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] cc crane radio
- From: "Dennis Gibson" <wb6tnb@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 22:40:15 -0700
I posted this a couple of weeks ago regarding my recently acquired Superadio
III:
Recently amazon.com was selling Superadio III's for $37.94 with free
shipping. I decided to get one to see if the noise floor problem had been
fixed. It arrived yesterday and I'm happy to say it seems quieter on AM and
the audio on AM is much improved. However it seems that the improvement in
audio quality has come at the cost of selectivity.
I have three stations using the same tower a little over a mile from here.
They're on 1290, 1340, and 1490. It's 1490's tower and all three are
nondirectional. 1490 is 1 KW fulltime, 1340 is 650 watts fulltime, and 1290
is 500 watts days and 122 watts nights.
I'll start with 1290. On the old radio I can hear stations on 1270, 1310,
and 1320. 1270 and 1310 are not strong but quite listenable and 1320 is very
weak but I can tell what kind of program they're running. I also have a
directional station on 1250 about 6 miles away; it runs 2.5 KW days and has
a minor null in my direction.
On the new radio I can't listen to 1270 or 1310 for very long without going
insane. 1270 is kinda sorta them with both 1250 and 1290 reminding you they
exist. 1320 is merely 1340 reminding you it exists.
1340: On the old radio 1360 is moderately strong but alone. On the new radio
1360 is there but 1340 is once again reminding you it exists. Not pleasant
to listen to.
1490: On the old radio there's a moderately strong station on 1470 all
alone. On the new radio 1470 is mostly 1490 reminding you it exists and a
lot less of but some 1450 from 35 miles away (a graveyarder!!).
I have a non-local on 1590 that's about 30 miles away and running 5 KW; all
of which is coming my way. The new radio doesn't do well with it. There's a
very weak signal on 1560 that the old radio has a bit of a hard time with
but it's there. I couldn't tell you what's being said; only that something
is being said. On the new radio that weak 1560 is desensitized enough by
1590 to the point it's not there. There's a TIS on 1610 that's near 1250
(coming from the opposite direction of 1590). The old radio hears it weakly
but solid. The new radio? What TIS?
The new radio is as sensitive as the old one but as you approach a very
strong signal there's no splash; it just starts to get intelligible 30 khz.
away then keeps getting better.
It's a great sounding radio on AM. I haven't played with the FM side other
than to verify it works. I used to own one of the Radio Shack Superadio
knockoffs (a friend gave it to me when he moved); it behaved somewhat this
way. I really want to like it more than I do now. I'll probably keep it
because it was cheap and the improved sound quality on AM. Is anyone here
able to decipher the date/factory code? On the new radio it's 1516 RA. The
old one is 4524C.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Martin" <mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club ofAmerica"
<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] cc crane radio
> Thanks. I have the SuperRadio 1 and 2, plus an old Sony ICF 6500 that
> cuts out at times. But other than that no other portables, except a boom
> box or two. The SR1 & 2 are my mainstay portables to listen to in bed. I
> have read many reviews on the SuperRadio 3 and it does match up to the 1
> and 2. So, I am trying to find a good portable for $100 or less that
> will do the trick for flying. Something that has decent gain and still
> small enough to travel with. The mini portables don't have the power I
> want, The 2010 and other such portables are too expensive. That is why I
> was looking at the S350. I'll check out the local Radio Shack.
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx