Re: [IRCA] IBOC (again)

["de Mary Anne / KE7CGZ" <ke7cgz@xxxxxxxx>]

Probably! <smile>

-----Original Message-----
From: irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Chuck Hutton
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 6:47 PM
To: 'Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America'
Subject: Re: [IRCA] IBOC (again)


Any chance that "1.1673 to 1.1249" should really be "1.1673 to 1.2149"???


Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of de Mary Anne / KE7CGZ
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 10:27 AM
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
Subject: Re: [IRCA] IBOC (again)

KEX Sideband in Portland narrow filter and max attenutation range from
1.174-1.206 Mhz (32 Khz) with IC-706 and 64'(80Mb 1/4 wave) multiband dipole
30' high with SE-NW orientation. WIth preamp on and no filter goes from
1.1673 to 1.1249.  I used HameRadioDeluxe to create Bandscope JPG that I
compare Attenuted S-meter chare with one with narrow Filter on. When I get
my good PC back I'll post it on my website.


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx