[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Two Thoughts About IBOC
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Two Thoughts About IBOC
- From: "Kevin R. in Gilbert, AZ" <amfmdx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 13:11:06 -0700
Title: Re: [IRCA] Two Thoughts About IBOC
I would not support CAM-D...I would only support the proven C-QUAM system, which is technically SUPERIOR to any digital system. I would also support a total ban on digital audio broadcasting below 1 GHz.
You would not support CAM-D even when you have never heard it and that it also simultaneously transmits in Kahn ISB stereo? I can hear SLC with CAM-D on 1280. I have been up in UT and have heard the analog portion so I can say that I have empirical evidence.
Why would you not support a system that supports analog AM stereo, is transparent to analog receivers and supplies a digital signal simultaneously?
Kevin
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx