Re: [IRCA] Two Thoughts About IBOC

["Chuck Hutton" <charlesh3@xxxxxxx>]

Why do you say that, Eric? Have you heard the audio quality of CAM-D? Tested
it's interference reduction? Checked out its coverage area?

The CAM-D inventor claims: "Cam-D provides a total increase in coverage,
over conventional AM of Two Times, DOUBLE that of AM.  And Cam-D also
provides almost fade free operation and practically eliminates power line
buzz, etc., etc."

Do you have information to the contrary?



Chuck


N0UIHEric@xxxxxxx wrote:

>I've heard this idea about "CAM-D" on the AM Stereo lists...and it's also a

>bunch of bunk. 

CLIP

>While IBOC cuts down on AM station coverage areas (and Leonard  
>Kahn's proposed "CAM-D" will also decrease AM station coverage areas),
C->QUAM doesn't.
> 
> 
>73, Eric (N0UIH)
>
>  

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx