[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IRCA] Re: IBOC WTEM 980
- Subject: [IRCA] Re: IBOC WTEM 980
- From: "Bill Harms" <wharms@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:03:05 -0500
- Content-description: Mail message body
- Priority: normal
Eric:
WTEM is 20.8 miles from me (and they are 50 kw). They absolutely ruined 970 and
990 here this morning. I have a semi-local on 970 (WAMD) that is now impossible to
hear without at least some IBOC remnant in the background. While I am not in
WAMD's main coverage area, I could hear them easily in the daytime here. I have to
wonder if WTEM is now trashing WAMD's signal in WAMD's main coverage area.
On 990, I COULD regularly hear two or three stations in the daytime by nulling the
others out, now that is virtually impossible. There is also some minimal hash on
1000 which will be annoying in some situations. With WPEN 950 using IBOC, I have
IBOC hash on 940, 960, 970, 990, and 1000. So, 960 may now have hash from two
stations.....
Bill Harms
On 19 Mar 2005 at 12:14, N0UIHEric@xxxxxxx wrote:
> How far are you from WTEM's transmitter site? I'm just 10 miles from
> KFUO 850's transmitter site on the campus of Concordia Seminary in
> Clayton, and I've had to say goodbye to both sunrise and sunset DX on
> 830, 840, 860 and 870; as well as daytime DX on those frequencies plus
> 820. WCBW 880 is, for all practical purposes, inaudible one mile from
> KFUO's transmitter site.
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx