Re: [HCDX] Kenwood R-1000 vs Drake R-8
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [HCDX] Kenwood R-1000 vs Drake R-8



Hi Patrick,

> Hi:
>
> Thanks for your reply. Yes, it is a Murata Filter. Sorry for the
> mispelled name there. I am wondering how the 2.7 khz filter in the
> R-1000 compared to the LC in the Drake R8. The Murata filter seems
> pretty good in the R 1000.

as OM Gert Nilsson wrote, the CFJ455K5 or CFJ455K4 could be the ones used in
the R 1000. Here are the values:

CFJ455K4
6 dB bandwidth: 2.7 kHz min
60dB bandwidth: 5.0 kHz max

The K5 is not listed, sorry, the values for the K6 are 2.0 / 4.0 kHz, and
for the K8 1.0 / 3.0 kHz. The K7 cannot be used, as it's center frequency is
453.5 instead of 455 kHz.

I owned a R 1000 about 22 years ago, and did some mods - filters,
attenuator, change of an FET...
No experience of my own with the Drake so far, so I cannot compare.

vy 73,
Willi

--
     _/_/ http://www.radio-portal.org
    _/_/ Shortwave and more linked to you
   _/_/ Willi H. Passmann Media Consulting
  _/_/  Oberhausener Str. 100, D-45476 Muelheim, Germany
 _/_/ Tel.: ++49-(0)208-77 93 99
 _/_/ Fax:: 0180 - 50 52 59 08 55 34

_______________________________________________
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
Hard-Core-DX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www2.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
_______________________________________________

Copyright (c) Hard-Core-DX.com

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Text. A copy of the license is available in http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.txt.

All the other copyright notices are VOID.