Re: [HCDX]: WGTG 6.890 SSB
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [HCDX]: WGTG 6.890 SSB
At the risk of starting a controversy, I have serious reservations
about e-mail QSLs. I prefer the paper QSL's through the mail. I
understand that e-mail QSL's are "easier" for the station personal,
but there are not the same.
>
> Even if you've already tried, try an e-mail follow-up report once
> more at wgtg@xxxxxxxxxxxx Make it short, and remind the Mgr that
> you will be perfectly happy with a short e-mail reply. That clue is
> what worked for me in October -99. The Mgr couldn't care less about
> verifying reports, so DXers should make it easy for him. And e-mail
> is of course easy, cheap and quick. Good luck!
>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Bill Harms
Elkridge, Maryland, USA
NRD-525
Bill's Ultimate TIS Digest
http://www.erols.com/wharms/tis/
Check out #swl and #MWDX IRC Chat on EF-Net. Ask me!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a message from "Bill Harms" <wharms@xxxxxxxxx>
to hard-core-dx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe the list, send
"unsubscribe hard-core-dx" in mail body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more information, please check http://www.kotalampi.com/hard-core-dx/
or email Risto Kotalampi, risto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------