Re: [HCDX]: Drake R8A / Icom R75
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [HCDX]: Drake R8A / Icom R75
Just bought the Service Manual on CD. It shows a 10 dB attenuator below 1,6 MHz.
There is a CP (=connection point) where you can short it out! Easily done, gives
some extra dB!
There also seems to be some kind of filter calibration in the R75. Turn the
receiver off, short the remote jack, press the ANT and CLOCK buttons and turn
the receiver on again. With the UP and DOWN buttons you can find the filter
calibration on the display. I have not tried it out myself! Perhaps it will
measure the bandwidths and adjust hte BFO frequencies, ad the AOR7030 does? No
information in the Service Manual about what it really means!
Gert Nilsson wrote:
> The 5,6 uV sensitivity for AM is with 6 kHz bandwidth and without the
> preamplifier. With amplifier and e g 2,8 kHz bandwidth I think sensitivity
> will be quite good. I think sensitivity is as good as my R71E which has
> compared favourably with AOR7030, R-390A, NRD 515 and NRD 525
>
> Richard Jary wrote:
>
> > I have the chance to buy either of these...a 2nd hand R8A or a new R75.
> >
> > Price: Drake R8A with various bits A$1200
> > Icom R75 brand new A$1390
> >
> > OK, the Icom is newer. I have read bad comments about it's audio quality,
> > though these may be fixed by the use of an external speaker. As I am also
> > into MW/Broadcast Band DX, I was not impressed by the R75's figures of
> > 5.6uV for the MW band, it appears like most receivers destined for the
> > US/Euro market that MW is deliberately crippled to cover the overloading
> > problem you get there.
> >
> > Here in Oz that isn't as big a problem, and I want MW coverage. So I would
> > like comments, especially from anyone who has compared the two on both HF
> > & MF.
> >
> > Icom R75 - New technology
> > Warranty
> >
> > Drake R8A - Better MW coverage
> > Slightly cheaper
> > Better audio?
> >
> > I have used a Drake R8A a few years ago on a DXpedition and found it good,
> > but would like to compare the two.
> >
> > Richard
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This is a message from Richard Jary <jary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > to hard-core-dx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe the list, send
> > "unsubscribe hard-core-dx" in mail body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > For more information, please check http://www.kotalampi.com/hard-core-dx/
> > or email Risto Kotalampi, risto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Gert Nilsson
> gert.nilsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://home.swipnet.se/~w-38231/index.htm
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This is a message from Gert Nilsson <gert.nilsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> to hard-core-dx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe the list, send
> "unsubscribe hard-core-dx" in mail body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For more information, please check http://www.kotalampi.com/hard-core-dx/
> or email Risto Kotalampi, risto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Gert Nilsson
gert.nilsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://home.swipnet.se/~w-38231/index.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a message from Gert Nilsson <gert.nilsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
to hard-core-dx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe the list, send
"unsubscribe hard-core-dx" in mail body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more information, please check http://www.kotalampi.com/hard-core-dx/
or email Risto Kotalampi, risto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------